[W5] HD 239 - 224 λ
+4
DT_LINK
b
DawnKnight
Rookie
8 posters
Prime League :: Prime League History :: Previous Prime League Seasons :: Seasons 7-11 :: Season 7 :: Division A
Page 1 of 1
[W5] HD 239 - 224 λ
GGs, rather intense. btw Cara, you need to edit their name to Airstrikers on the main table. You're missing the letter r.
Rookie- Posts : 410
Re: [W5] HD 239 - 224 λ
It would have been nice if Ito and Rookie decided to join the comm earlier...Then I wouldn't have had to leave for the last two races and we could have won.
Whatever, GGs nonetheless aside from rWP which was so laggy it wasn't possible to disallow HD from top 4'ing.......The lag overall in this war was annoying.
Whatever, GGs nonetheless aside from rWP which was so laggy it wasn't possible to disallow HD from top 4'ing.......The lag overall in this war was annoying.
DawnKnight- Posts : 120
Re: [W5] HD 239 - 224 λ
We can't speed up our joining connection, just saying. We went as quickly as possible, and I'm not sure if you would've won after BC (race 11). I think the triple reds evened out any lag complaints that could possibly be brought up as well
Rookie- Posts : 410
Re: [W5] HD 239 - 224 λ
I dc'ed right at the start of BC, which is probably why we didn't do very well on that race if that's what you mean. And even when Ito joined the comm you were too slow to join it until a whole autostart (And thus ensued the "Ito has internet problems and can't join please let him join first, etc.") This all happened after I said I had to leave very soon which makes me almost feel it was strategic, but whatever.Rookie wrote:We can't speed up our joining connection, just saying. We went as quickly as possible, and I'm not sure if you would've won after BC (race 11). I think the triple reds evened out any lag complaints that could possibly be brought up as well
Also, you guys got triple reds pretty much the same amount as us as far as I saw, you just didn't utilize them well.
GGs, it's just frustrating that all of this happened and I had no control over the last two key races because the other team was too slow in joining.
DawnKnight- Posts : 120
Re: [W5] HD 239 - 224 λ
The triple red statement is a complete lie, we got some at rWP but other than that it was all you guys. FF got some on CM but had to use them to destroy one of yours anyway, and when Ito got one at rBC1 he was immediately bombed. What frustrates me is that a team can't simply say GGs anymore, and won't even look at the fact that the other side may of had some complaints of their own (because we had quite a bit ourselves). Both sides are blaming the other for something they can't control at all. It's not our problem that you guys didn't have 4 at the match time yesterday, that's the only reason why you had to leave anyway. Then again, Marv would've played yesterday so maybe it's better that you guys did reschedule. Nothing was strategic. I'm almost ashamed that you would even think that too. Who do you think we are? wa?DawnKnight wrote:I dc'ed right at the start of BC, which is probably why we didn't do very well on that race if that's what you mean. And even when Ito joined the comm you were too slow to join it until a whole autostart (And thus ensued the "Ito has internet problems and can't join please let him join first, etc.") This all happened after I said I had to leave very soon which makes me almost feel it was strategic, but whatever.Rookie wrote:We can't speed up our joining connection, just saying. We went as quickly as possible, and I'm not sure if you would've won after BC (race 11). I think the triple reds evened out any lag complaints that could possibly be brought up as well
Also, you guys got triple reds pretty much the same amount as us as far as I saw, you just didn't utilize them well.
GGs, it's just frustrating that all of this happened and I had no control over the last two key races because the other team was too slow in joining.
Rookie- Posts : 410
Re: [W5] HD 239 - 224 λ
Luck belongs to the Champi-Brothers, and possibly Roro. That's it.
DT_LINK- Posts : 55
Re: [W5] HD 239 - 224 λ
I respect you for admitting it. Please win PLDT_LINK wrote:Luck belongs to the Champi-Brothers, and possibly Roro. That's it.
Rookie- Posts : 410
Re: [W5] HD 239 - 224 λ
CB is very lucky, they even get shocks by counter bagging !
Crazykonga- Posts : 124
Age : 29
Location : France
Re: [W5] HD 239 - 224 λ
Don't forget that this season is the 7th. And we play Mario Kart 7, which is supposed to represent the item 7, ie the luckiest object of the game. Champi-Brothers can only win because we are the luckiest. And no need good players for that, just lucky !
DT_LINK- Posts : 55
Re: [W5] HD 239 - 224 λ
Rookie it is fine, I respect you. Sure I think you mean well, we've just frustrated because prior, us 4 just come online and get this lineup quick... Wata to leave soon. And, rWP made this worse.Rookie wrote:The triple red statement is a complete lie, we got some at rWP but other than that it was all you guys. FF got some on CM but had to use them to destroy one of yours anyway, and when Ito got one at rBC1 he was immediately bombed. What frustrates me is that a team can't simply say GGs anymore, and won't even look at the fact that the other side may of had some complaints of their own (because we had quite a bit ourselves). Both sides are blaming the other for something they can't control at all. It's not our problem that you guys didn't have 4 at the match time yesterday, that's the only reason why you had to leave anyway. Then again, Marv would've played yesterday so maybe it's better that you guys did reschedule. Nothing was strategic. I'm almost ashamed that you would even think that too. Who do you think we are? wa?DawnKnight wrote:I dc'ed right at the start of BC, which is probably why we didn't do very well on that race if that's what you mean. And even when Ito joined the comm you were too slow to join it until a whole autostart (And thus ensued the "Ito has internet problems and can't join please let him join first, etc.") This all happened after I said I had to leave very soon which makes me almost feel it was strategic, but whatever.Rookie wrote:We can't speed up our joining connection, just saying. We went as quickly as possible, and I'm not sure if you would've won after BC (race 11). I think the triple reds evened out any lag complaints that could possibly be brought up as well
Also, you guys got triple reds pretty much the same amount as us as far as I saw, you just didn't utilize them well.
GGs, it's just frustrating that all of this happened and I had no control over the last two key races because the other team was too slow in joining.
I admit we get more triples reds than you, it's true. You play better, it happens. GGs this war
TurniPeach- Posts : 1
Re: [W5] HD 239 - 224 λ
I said that from what I saw we had nearly the same amount of triple reds. I was bagging and frontrunning many races, so I may not have seen everything.Rookie wrote:The triple red statement is a complete lie, we got some at rWP but other than that it was all you guys. FF got some on CM but had to use them to destroy one of yours anyway, and when Ito got one at rBC1 he was immediately bombed. What frustrates me is that a team can't simply say GGs anymore, and won't even look at the fact that the other side may of had some complaints of their own (because we had quite a bit ourselves). Both sides are blaming the other for something they can't control at all. It's not our problem that you guys didn't have 4 at the match time yesterday, that's the only reason why you had to leave anyway. Then again, Marv would've played yesterday so maybe it's better that you guys did reschedule. Nothing was strategic. I'm almost ashamed that you would even think that too. Who do you think we are? wa?DawnKnight wrote:I dc'ed right at the start of BC, which is probably why we didn't do very well on that race if that's what you mean. And even when Ito joined the comm you were too slow to join it until a whole autostart (And thus ensued the "Ito has internet problems and can't join please let him join first, etc.") This all happened after I said I had to leave very soon which makes me almost feel it was strategic, but whatever.Rookie wrote:We can't speed up our joining connection, just saying. We went as quickly as possible, and I'm not sure if you would've won after BC (race 11). I think the triple reds evened out any lag complaints that could possibly be brought up as well
Also, you guys got triple reds pretty much the same amount as us as far as I saw, you just didn't utilize them well.
GGs, it's just frustrating that all of this happened and I had no control over the last two key races because the other team was too slow in joining.
Also, you cannot expect people to simply say "GGs" if you use such laggy players. If you don't use such laggy players, or fix your connections, people won't rage as often.
I'm sorry if it seems like I'm raging but I'm just very frustrated that it seemed that you weren't trying to hurry at all to get in the community. (It was said you were playing pokemon still several minutes after you said we would war) I don't feel like debating this anymore, but you have to realize that my frustration makes sense.
DawnKnight- Posts : 120
Re: [W5] HD 239 - 224 λ
ItoI wasn't aware that we were starting very soon, he was just in the chat waiting for some word when I told him to join the community, and then he rushed and saved and joined as quickly as possible. We weren't intending to hold you up. We can do nothing of our connections. ItoI has told me until university he isn't allowed to get a new one for the house. ItoI hardly even lags for me, especially compared to others, he is just slow to join the room. I feel like blaming his lag is simply a popular and accepted trend by opponents to lose to us simply to feel better. What do you expect us to do? Not use possibly our best member for wars when he wants to? I don't see many teams simply say GGs when they lose anymore as well, it's not just you, other than WEC really.
Rookie- Posts : 410
Prime League :: Prime League History :: Previous Prime League Seasons :: Seasons 7-11 :: Season 7 :: Division A
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|